Food Service Contractors · Texas

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston

Livingston, TX · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston: 5.1 TCR = 171% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston safety composite

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.8

2017→2022

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston's TCR fell 9.8 from 9.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.8 · 2018=21.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Livingston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 171% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #399/570
  • PHOTO CarletonColl Burton
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CarletonColl Burton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston averages 5.1 TCR (171% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston TCR series: 2017=9.8 · 2018=21 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #399 safest of 570 Food Service Contractors employers in Texas.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston (20 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston
Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston (20 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Mem - Livingston has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 21.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 9.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · TX · Livingston

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 27 employers in Livingston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CarletonColl Burton 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitre One 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT USMC W MH 520430 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ST MARY'S HEALTH CENTER 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms TXP 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANNONADE SOD FARM 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Society #1 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Slaton Coop Gin 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas Tribal Economic Development Authority DBA Naskila Casino 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR 275 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 275 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center Livingston 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-AA-PIT-PITTSBURGH-PIT-TRML 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR San Diego Tree 49230 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Gabriel's 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Colorado Northwest Comm. Coll 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Cumberland County Vo Tech 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Swiss Int'L Airlines Jfk T4 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Univ of Rio Grande 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.