Food Service Contractors · Texas

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage

Houston, TX · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage: 3.5 TCR = 118% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage safety composite

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.6

2016→2023

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage's TCR fell 17.6 from 17.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.6 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #304/570
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT WAKE FORES…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT WAKE FOREST WILKES MED CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage averages 3.5 TCR (118% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage TCR series: 2016=17.6 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #304 safest of 570 Food Service Contractors employers in Texas.

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage (29 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage
Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage (29 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Vintage has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 17.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · TX · Houston

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT WAKE FOREST WILKES MED CTR 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR M7311 Baptist Healt 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTA Chick Fil A 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jane Street - Vesey Street 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Douglasville, Ga #00350 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange Newark Elizabeth Bus Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR East Conn St 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MCRT2 Richmond Tenant LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Structures 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Foods Group, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Phh Menifee Valley Med Ctr Fns 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE MeadowRidge 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.