Building Cleaning/Maintenance · Illinois

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2

Chicago, IL · ~164 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2: 4.2 TCR = 93% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 safety composite

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2022

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=8.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #118/189
  • PHOTO Orlando Vineland Pre…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 averages 4.2 TCR (93% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=8.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 189 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in Illinois.

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 (164 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2
Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 (164 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 has more employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 4 0 0
2019 8.8 1.8 15 0 0
2018 5.5 2.5 8 1 0
2017 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2016 5.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · IL · Chicago

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 909 Mizner Park 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miami International Mall 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jordan Valley Medical Center - EVS 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Woodhull WOO1 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Belleville 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Grove Confectionery Co 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Melrose Park 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hca-Henrico Doctors - Forest C 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Delivery 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Fe Springs 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PBI104 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mg Mga 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE rPlanet Earth 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilbert 39330 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE EZ Excavating 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.