Building Cleaning/Maintenance · Illinois

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm

Chicago, IL · ~150 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm: 3.6 TCR = 80% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm safety composite

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2021

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm injury rate improved

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=7.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #100/189
  • PHOTO City Wide Building S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Wide Building Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm averages 3.6 TCR (80% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=7 · 2021=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 189 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in Illinois.

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm (150 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm
Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm (150 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm has more employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · IL · Chicago

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Wide Building Services 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwall Regional Hospital LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AK Building Services Inc 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HES H Ed at New Albany Floyd County 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lendlease - Chicago Office 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE JL Allen Services, Inc. 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE 128 - Archer - United JV 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE 17064 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lhp - Portneuf Food 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Campbell Tractor - Fruitland 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ARC Firestone 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NEX Transport (Main Campus) 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Platte Terminal - DOT 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE ZModular 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beasley Flooring Products 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laredo Petroleum - Tulsa 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.