Food Service Contractors · Florida

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a

Daytona Beach, FL · ~46 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a: 0.8 TCR = 27% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a safety composite

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Daytona Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/378
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT ADRIAN COL…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT ADRIAN COLLEGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a averages 0.8 TCR (27% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a TCR series: 2018=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 378 Food Service Contractors employers in Florida.

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a (46 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a
Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a (46 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Embry Riddle - Chick-Fil-a has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · FL · Daytona Beach

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 249 employers in Daytona Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ADRIAN COLLEGE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT AJ GALLAGHER CAFE RETAIL 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&M Farms of North Florida, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert C Hatton Inc 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hundley Farms Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panhandle Growers, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Memorial Medical Center 2,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Daytona Beach 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMA Healthcare, Inc 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethune Cookman University 682 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at the Citadel - Mess Hall 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SPRINGDALE 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Oklahoma 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southland Industries Garden Grove 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gerhardi Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Le Moyne College-Dolphin Den 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Carrier Clinic Food 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lipscomb Univ - Starbucks 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.