Building Cleaning Maintenance · Tennessee

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es

Chattanooga, TN · ~312 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building Cleaning Maintenance workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es: 3.6 TCR = 79% of Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es safety composite

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es injury rate improved

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=8.0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #79/119
  • PHOTO Aid Maintenance Co. …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~312 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aid Maintenance Co. Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es averages 3.6 TCR (79% of the Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=8 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 119 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers in Tennessee.

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es (312 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es
Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es (312 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Erlanger Main Es has more employees than the Building Cleaning Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2022 0.9 0.3 3 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2019 8.0 0.7 12 0 0
2018 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2017 8.9 4.1 11 0 0
2016 3.9 1.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TN · Chattanooga

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aid Maintenance Co. Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FBG Facility Services - Minnesota 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln GSSI Custodial Contract 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulane Lakeside - EVS 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Renfro - Cleveland Plant 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valero Refining Tennessee 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE YAPP USA Automotive Systems Inc. 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2932 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Embry Riddle 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Koala Kare Products 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HCA Florida Osceola Hospital 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianola, DC 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tolin Mechanical Systems Company 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeastern Virginia Training Center 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Complex 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plantel Nurseries Inc. 312 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.