Food Service Contractors · District of Columbia

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck

Washington, DC · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck: 1.7 TCR = 58% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck safety composite

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2018→2022

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck injury rate improved

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/87
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT UNITED CLU…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT UNITED CLUB LAS PER PAX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck averages 1.7 TCR (58% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck TCR series: 2018=7 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 87 Food Service Contractors employers in District of Columbia.

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck (22 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck
Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck (22 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at George Washington Hos-Starbuck has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.0 7.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · DC · Washington

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UNITED CLUB LAS PER PAX 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thomas Cuisine @ ERC Colorado 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UNIV OF CINCINNATI MED CTR 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frye Regional Medical Center - FNS 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2016104 Freedom Plaza 1301 Pennsylvania Ave 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medtronic Commercial - Washington DC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - Washignton, DC - 1WDC7 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICITAP US DC ICITAP OPDAT HQ DC063 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Exxonmobil-Granite Cafe 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aau - 620 Cafe 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S.M. Lawrence 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Town Hall 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Umass Albert Sherman Center 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Wilmac Lancashire Hall 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at P&G St. Louis Janitorial 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Latuff Brothers Auto Body 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.