Food Service Contractors · Arizona

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba

Phoenix, AZ · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba: 2.2 TCR = 73% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba safety composite

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/152
  • PHOTO FGCU Starbucks
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FGCU Starbucks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba averages 2.2 TCR (73% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 152 Food Service Contractors employers in Arizona.

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba (26 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba
Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba (26 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Jamba has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · Phoenix

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FGCU Starbucks 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR COFFEE BREAK ROASTING COMPANY 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SLU REINERT TO GO 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT Nebraska HC Medicine Retail 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marana 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&H Farms, LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snowflake 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yucca 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Parks, Recreation, and Leisure Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SODEXO AT Nebraska HC Medicine Retail 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeside Book Company - Harrisonburg South 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Idaho Falls ID Truss 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Fannie Mae Utc Util Systms 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Clements University Hospital 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Erlanger East Food 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassus - North Georgia II Ellijay 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.