Facilities Support Services · Illinois

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy

Lake Forest, IL · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy: 2.0 TCR = 75% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy safety composite

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2018→2024

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy injury rate improved

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Lake Forest, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/46
  • PHOTO Cherry Point
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cherry Point (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy averages 2.0 TCR (75% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 46 Facilities Support Services employers in Illinois.

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy (52 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy
Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy (52 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy has fewer employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · IL · Lake Forest

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 50 employers in Lake Forest, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cherry Point 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP-BAY MED CTR 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ILLINOIS MATH & SCIENCE ACADEM 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HUNTINGTON UNIVERSITY-HABECKER 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curative Health Cultivation LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2502-Ashton, IL (Monsanto Co.) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauget 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1240-Monmouth, IL (Monsanto Co.) 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR US - Corporate : 0G01 2,455 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0G01 - CORP LAKE FOREST, IL 2,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL 1,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0G11 - CORP LAKE FOREST, IL 1,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Timms Trucking & Excavating Ltd 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cranbury, NJ - Cranbury Statio 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VCSS West Sacramento 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sakata Seed America, Inc. - Morgan Hill, CA 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Einste 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Saint Catherine University 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harnden Construction Services 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE McMinnville 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.