Building Cleaning/Maintenance · California

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr

Sylmar, CA · ~166 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr: 10.1 TCR = 224% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr safety composite

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.0

2017→2021

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr injury rate improved

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr's TCR fell 15.0 from 17.1 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.1 · 2018=12.1 · 2019=9.1 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Sylmar, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 224% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #302/368
  • PHOTO MA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr averages 10.1 TCR (224% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr TCR series: 2017=17.1 · 2018=12.1 · 2019=9.1 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #302 safest of 368 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr (166 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr
Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr (166 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Olive View-Ucla Med Ctr has more employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 1.0 8 2 0
2019 9.1 3.0 12 0 0
2018 12.1 2.3 16 0 0
2017 17.1 6.2 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Sylmar

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 112 employers in Sylmar, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MA 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameri-Kleen - Salinas Branch 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ARDENT LHP PORTNEUF ES 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Management Resources Quincy University 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kay Dix, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLOVIS OFFICE 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stronghold Engineering, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete North, Inc. 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olive View-UCLA Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRM Sylmar CA 1,331 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 405 1,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Sylmar 1,270 FTE
NAT-TCR 567220-Mil-Root River Br 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WVUH United Linen 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie Senior Cottages LLC - Isanti 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CEDI Chicago 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE R&J Investment Co., Inc. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain : Montana Precision Products 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44221d - South Dc 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Office Furniture 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.