Food Service Contractors · South Carolina

Sodexo at Richland School District Two

Columbia, SC · ~192 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Richland School District Two runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Richland School District Two: 3.2 TCR = 106% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Richland School District Two safety composite

Sodexo at Richland School District Two scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at Richland School District Two: 2.4 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 3.83× in 2024

Sodexo at Richland School District Two's TCR rose 9.7 from 2.4 in 2017 to 12.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 106% of ind

  • DART 12.2 DART
  • RANK #60/132
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT COLORADO S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Richland School District Two in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Richland School District Two averages 3.2 TCR (106% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Richland School District Two TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Richland School District Two falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 132 Food Service Contractors employers in South Carolina.

Sodexo at Richland School District Two (192 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Richland School District Two
Sodexo at Richland School District Two (192 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Richland School District Two has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 12.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 1.2 3 0 0
2018 4.8 1.2 4 0 0
2017 2.4 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · SC · Columbia

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT PROVIDENCE S.D ADMIN 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Brown University 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR KIPP 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beaufort Jasper Water and Sewer Authority 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE AstenJohnson CLT 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crane Payment Innovations, Inc 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1937 - Greer 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Providence S.D Admin 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ajay North America, LLC. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC Dayton, OH 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Clovis 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of Orange County Corporate Office 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03893 - WM of Collier County 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernie Ball Inc. 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCMC 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.