Food Service Contractors · California

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone

Roseville, CA · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone: 5.9 TCR = 195% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone safety composite

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2021

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone injury rate improved

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.3 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=7.7 · 2021=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 195% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #358/586
  • PHOTO Pioneer College Cate…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 003/MidAmerica Nazarene University (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone averages 5.9 TCR (195% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.7 · 2021=2.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #358 safest of 586 Food Service Contractors employers in California.

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone (29 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone
Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone (29 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Roseville Commons- Ray Stone has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 7.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Roseville

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 003/MidAmerica Nazarene University 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAID SUITES 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AFRH 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT TAYLOR I.S.D. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Casa de la Luz Hospice 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ROC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CM17HCCllc 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GFL Environmental USA Inc. - Pontiac, MI 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Yeadon 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCG LLC dba Reserve 1 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Old Orchard Healthcare Center 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne WY - Walmart - NON DOT 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.