Food Service Contractors · California

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food

Chula Vista, CA · ~94 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food: 5.4 TCR = 179% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food safety composite

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2017→2021

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food injury rate improved

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food's TCR fell 4.3 from 5.2 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=12.0 · 2021=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 179% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #336/586
  • PHOTO Owen J. Roberts SD
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Owen J. Roberts SD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food averages 5.4 TCR (179% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=12 · 2021=0.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #336 safest of 586 Food Service Contractors employers in California.

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food (94 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food
Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food (94 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Food has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2019 12.0 5.1 7 0 0
2018 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Chula Vista

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Owen J. Roberts SD 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000007914 MIDWAY UNIVERSITY 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4021-000016453 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SECURIAN FINANCIAL GROUP 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORALES FARM LABOR SERVICE 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Enterprises, Inc 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Martinez Contracting 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-TX06 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Facility 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifesprk at Brightondale Senior Campus 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Olathe Medical Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bellevue MCPP 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mankato Terminal - DOT 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morsco Supply Co. #3008/3999 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation : Mauston 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.