Building Cleaning Maintenance · California

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs

San Diego, CA · ~79 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning Maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs: 11.3 TCR = 250% of Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs safety composite

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs: 14.7 → 21.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 27.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs's TCR rose 7.0 from 14.7 in 2017 to 21.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 250% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #321/368
  • PHOTO 259548
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 259548 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs averages 11.3 TCR (250% of the Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs TCR series: 2017=14.7 · 2018=27.6 · 2019=4.2 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=21.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #321 safest of 368 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs (79 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs
Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs (79 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Sharp Mary Birch Evs has more employees than the Building Cleaning Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.7 0.0 5 0 0
2023 7.5 3.8 6 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.5 0.8 1 1 0
2019 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2018 27.6 6.4 13 0 0
2017 14.7 0.0 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · San Diego

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 259548 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCA Florida South Tampa Hospital - EVS 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ES 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Socal Construction & Clean Up, Inc. 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Voestalpine Precision Strip, LLC 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sienna Skilled Nursing and Rehab 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - N.Salt Lake,UT 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McMahon 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The NOCO Company 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bear Contracting, LLC. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doylestown Health Care Center 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. James High School 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.