Facilities Support Services · California

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom

San Diego, CA · ~65 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom: 4.2 TCR = 162% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom safety composite

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2021

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom injury rate improved

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom's TCR fell 2.8 from 3.9 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=5.9 · 2021=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #42/69
  • PHOTO General Service Depa…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Service Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom averages 4.2 TCR (162% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=6 · 2019=5.9 · 2021=1.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 69 Facilities Support Services employers in California.

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom (65 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom
Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom (65 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Sharp Memorial Hospital - Pom has more employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2019 5.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 6.0 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · CA · San Diego

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Service Department 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (BWT) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4238-260 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRAX Test Services 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunnySlope Tree Farm, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Nursery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Jager Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Demler Enterprises, LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR RD-Randolph CSC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 121 Marketing Services Group 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Algoma 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Counseling and Consultation Services, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca - Conroe Regional 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Holy Cross Village @ Notre Dam 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yorkville Reporting Center 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2077-Us Dd Nw Jersey City Branch 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.