janitorial Services · District of Columbia

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac

Washington, DC · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical janitorial Services workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac: 1.6 TCR = 35% of janitorial Services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac safety composite

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2017→2024

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac injury rate improved

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac's TCR fell 7.8 from 7.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/28
  • PHOTO QSI Dayton
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QSI Dayton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac averages 1.6 TCR (35% of the janitorial Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac falls in its industry

4,064 janitorial Services establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 28 janitorial Services employers in District of Columbia.

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac (25 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac
Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac (25 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at St Albans School for Boys Fac has fewer employees than the janitorial Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · DC · Washington

4,064 janitorial Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QSI Dayton 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MidAmerican Building Services - Madison Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 196917 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interstate Cleaning Corporate Office 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDC, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.REMOTE 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1915-1703X 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cost Plus World Market CHEVY CHASE 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Hi-Grade Materials-Littlerock 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill of Orange County Corporate Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum North Kansas City 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE JR Manufacturing 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burton Retail NYC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Paul Utilities and Excavating, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Service Technician 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.