Food Service Contractors · Massachusetts

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset

Boston, MA · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset: 3.6 TCR = 120% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset safety composite

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.0

2017→2022

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset injury rate improved

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset's TCR fell 18.0 from 18.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Boston, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #132/192
  • PHOTO Merit Health Biloxi …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Merit Health Biloxi - FNS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset averages 3.6 TCR (120% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset TCR series: 2017=18 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 192 Food Service Contractors employers in Massachusetts.

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset (30 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset
Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset (30 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Suffolk University-Somerset has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 18.0 9.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MA · Boston

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Merit Health Biloxi - FNS 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell College Milner Hall 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duval Cty #10 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New York Yankees 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Best Bees Company 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Wareham 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kneeland 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lagasse Group, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Massachusetts General Hospital 26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Hospital 19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Womens Hospital 19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Hospital 18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR San Francisco Parts Distribution Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyline Design, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GNS North America 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crazy Fish Int'l Fort Lauderdale 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glopak Corp. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Manorcare Lancaster 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Glove Transportation Services, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at the Pennington School 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.