Food Service Contractors · California

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center

Sacramento, CA · ~69 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center: 2.7 TCR = 91% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center safety composite

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2017→2024

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center injury rate improved

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center's TCR fell 10.3 from 10.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #167/586
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT UNIV OF LO…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT UNIV OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center averages 2.7 TCR (91% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center TCR series: 2017=10.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 586 Food Service Contractors employers in California.

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center (69 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center
Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center (69 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Sutter Medical Center has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.4 2.6 4 0 0
2017 10.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Sacramento

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT UNIV OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT NMSU CROSSROADS FOOD COURT 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Abbey Coll 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LOUSIVILLE RIVERBATS 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Machine Concepts Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR KC Industries Trucking, LLC. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eltings Corners 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 156 Conroe 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Middletown City Schools 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05504 - WM Matawan Hauling 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE EPPA Fairview Ridges Hospital 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE S08884 - Rsi 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.