Building Cleaning/Maintenance · California

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax

Los Angeles, CA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax: 1.4 TCR = 32% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax safety composite

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=4.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/368
  • PHOTO QSI Fayetteville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QSI Fayetteville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax averages 1.4 TCR (32% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=4.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 368 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax (51 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax
Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax (51 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at United Polaris Lax Per Pax has fewer employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Los Angeles

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QSI Fayetteville 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Executive Management Services - Harrisburg, PA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Commercial Cleaning, LLC - Columbus 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compass Microsoft Cafe 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Phipps Botanical Gardens 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hca-Wesley Woodlawn 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Covalence Specialty Adhesives dba Berry Global 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitestown XWT 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Middletown City Schools Clean 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Western Ill-Corbin-Olson 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Univ of Denver - Nelson 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at North Fulton Hospital 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.