Building Cleaning/Maintenance · Louisiana

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac

New Orleans, LA · ~127 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac: 1.9 TCR = 43% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac safety composite

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2022

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac injury rate improved

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · New Orleans, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/61
  • PHOTO Caterpillar Pontiac …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caterpillar Pontiac - VSI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 61 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in Louisiana.

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac (127 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac
Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac (127 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Univ. New Orleans -Fac has more employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · LA · New Orleans

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 450 employers in New Orleans, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caterpillar Pontiac - VSI 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Maids of Sterling 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triangle Services - New York City Janitorial Route 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Go Daddy- AZ 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Products - Gas Plants 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crescent Crown Distributing, L.L.C. // Lafayette 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookshires #017 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5081 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCMC Health 8,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN 4,395 FTE
NAT-TCR Miami Office 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago NorthEast 38730 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson 1170 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5172 Bolingbrook Assembly 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Uab - Campus Dining 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Packaging Corporation - Kettering 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tony's Finer Foods 1167 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00943 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.