Facilities Support Services · Florida

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm

Tampa, FL · ~87 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm: 0.6 TCR = 25% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm safety composite

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm injury rate improved

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/40
  • PHOTO Cushman and Wakefiel…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cushman and Wakefield Humana Account (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm averages 0.6 TCR (25% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 40 Facilities Support Services employers in Florida.

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm (87 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm
Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm (87 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at University of Tampa Fm has more employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · FL · Tampa

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cushman and Wakefield Humana Account 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UK Patient Observation Service 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S3 Stennis Space Center (SSC) Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memorial Hospital Patient Obse 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato PH 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Arcadia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Lake City 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal River Nuclear Plant 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Arizona State Athletics 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hubbard Tool and Die Corporation 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monument Chemical, Brandenburg KY 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bentley University 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at City of Woonsocket Educ Dept 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Western Connecticut St Univ Mi 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Horizons Enterprises, LLC 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.