Facilities Support Services · Indiana

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac

Washington, IN · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac: 4.8 TCR = 184% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac safety composite

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2017→2022

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac injury rate improved

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac's TCR fell 8.4 from 8.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.4 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Washington, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO Technica LLC - 63rd …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Technica LLC - 63rd RSC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac averages 4.8 TCR (184% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac TCR series: 2017=8.4 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Facilities Support Services employers in Indiana.

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac (54 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac
Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac (54 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at Washington Community - Fac has fewer employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 11.8 4.0 3 0 0
2017 8.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · IN · Washington

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 42 employers in Washington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Technica LLC - 63rd RSC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT VANGUARD GROUP-PA LEANDER 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manchester TN - Kasai 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MARIAN UNIVERSITY FACILITIES 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Indianapolis 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore TC Service Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark County REMC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 800-DREES-INDIANAPOLIS 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Plant 735 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1162 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1162 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR WASH-WB 224 FTE
NAT-TCR CANTEX INC. Auburndale 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Umass Albert Sherman Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 02010-02-02-NEWARK 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pt Burgess Mc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chartwell Hospitality - Black Fox Lodge 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Usmc-E Mh 227 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond RIC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCI Bay Area Scaffold 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.