Building Cleaning Maintenance · California

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center

Los Angeles, CA · ~131 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning Maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center: 6.6 TCR = 146% of Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center safety composite

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center: 7.6 → 20.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center's TCR rose 13.3 from 7.6 in 2017 to 20.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #227/368
  • PHOTO Chesapeake Regional …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chesapeake Regional Medical Ce (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center averages 6.6 TCR (146% of the Building Cleaning Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=20.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 368 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center (131 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center
Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center (131 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at White Memorial Medical Center has more employees than the Building Cleaning Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.9 0.0 11 0 0
2023 2.8 0.6 5 0 0
2022 3.3 1.4 8 1 0
2021 1.8 0.7 5 0 0
2020 6.5 3.9 5 0 0
2019 8.5 1.2 7 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 7.6 1.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Los Angeles

4,064 Building Cleaning Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chesapeake Regional Medical Ce 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Carolina Hospital - EVS 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aultman Hospital 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0460 Rudy's Tortillas - Carrollton 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Babe Blosser Ranch 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dave Wilson Nursery 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Flora Corp 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Land FLC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Lights Academy 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation - Chester (Welkind) 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PRIER Products, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crandic Shops 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor South 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Redwood Falls 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03806 - Wildwood Hauling 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04045 - WM of Dallas 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.