Sawdust, regrinding · California

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips

Ontario, CA · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sawdust, regrinding workplace, earning a grade F.

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips: 10.6 TCR = 322% of Sawdust, regrinding BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips safety composite

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips: 3.3 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 16.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips's TCR rose 6.5 from 3.3 in 2018 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 322% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/22
  • PHOTO Designed Cabinets, I…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Designed Cabinets, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Soil Amendments and Playground Chips averages 10.6 TCR (322% of the Sawdust, regrinding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips TCR series: 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=16.7 · 2021=16.1 · 2022=15.1 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Soil Amendments and Playground Chips falls in its industry

405 Sawdust, regrinding establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 22 Sawdust, regrinding employers in California.

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips (31 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Soil Amendments and Playground Chips
Soil Amendments and Playground Chips (31 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Soil Amendments and Playground Chips has fewer employees than the Sawdust, regrinding median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 0.0 1 1 0
2023 13.6 4.5 3 0 0
2022 15.1 7.6 4 0 0
2021 16.1 4.0 3 1 1
2020 16.7 11.1 6 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · CA · Ontario

405 Sawdust, regrinding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Designed Cabinets, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWPI-Beckley 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Creek Inc 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lignetics of Jaffrey 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Easton 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bridge at Orlando 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Revere Terminal 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Rise Windows Doors, Corp 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior One Roofing, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Independence Village of East Lansing 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milford DE DE 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.