General services departments, government · California

Solid Waste Management Divison

San Bernardino, CA · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Solid Waste Management Divison runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade C.

Solid Waste Management Divison: 3.2 TCR = 100% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Solid Waste Management Divison safety composite

Solid Waste Management Divison scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Solid Waste Management Divison held a steady TCR band

Solid Waste Management Divison's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.8 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · San Bernardino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #89/256
  • PHOTO Winona Library
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winona Library (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Solid Waste Management Divison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Solid Waste Management Divison averages 3.2 TCR (100% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Solid Waste Management Divison TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Solid Waste Management Divison falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 256 General services departments, employers in California.

Solid Waste Management Divison (75 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Solid Waste Management Divison
Solid Waste Management Divison (75 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Solid Waste Management Divison has fewer employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.1 1.4 3 0 0
2017 2.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · San Bernardino

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winona Library 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Dept. - Public Works Engineering 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Hamden - Administration 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 14445 Olive View Dr. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR 31 Iron Horse Road 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RPM Diesel Engine Co 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MillerCoors Milwaukee Brewery 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cellofoam-Whiteland, IN-BM/FAB 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque - AMG Specialty Hospital 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCD Equipment 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE New York Parts Distribution Center - Somerset 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnsville Volkswagen Inc. 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.