Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

Somerby of Mobile

Mobile, AL · ~146 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Somerby of Mobile runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Somerby of Mobile: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Somerby of Mobile safety composite

Somerby of Mobile scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

Somerby of Mobile injury rate improved

Somerby of Mobile's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=7.9 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=14.9 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mobile, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #42/64
  • PHOTO Sycamore Glen
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sycamore Glen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Somerby of Mobile in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Somerby of Mobile averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Somerby of Mobile TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=7.9 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=14.9 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Somerby of Mobile falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

Somerby of Mobile (146 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Somerby of Mobile
Somerby of Mobile (146 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Somerby of Mobile has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 14.9 6.4 14 0 0
2022 8.1 4.0 4 4 0
2021 13.5 6.0 9 0 0
2020 9.8 1.4 7 0 0
2017 7.9 2.0 7 1 0
2016 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Mobile

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sycamore Glen 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hacienda Del Rey 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Deerwood Independent Living 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charleston Gardens 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Irondale Industrial Contractors, Inc 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Asphalt Company 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kronospan Particle Board AN27 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE TriRx Huntsville Pharmaceutical Services, LLC 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Sprout Statesville 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Hills LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1292 - Christiansburg 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 0913 - Foothill Ranch 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wurth Baer Supply Co Vernon Hills 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10453 Wilmington 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10352 Pompano Beach 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10173 Santa Monica 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.