Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Somerby Sandy Springs

Sandy Springs, GA · ~129 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Somerby Sandy Springs runs at 402% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Somerby Sandy Springs: 15.3 TCR = 402% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Somerby Sandy Springs safety composite

Somerby Sandy Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.2

2016→2024

Somerby Sandy Springs injury rate improved

Somerby Sandy Springs's TCR fell 13.2 from 14.3 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 35.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2017=16.8 · 2020=33.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=35.7 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sandy Springs, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.3 · 402% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #173/205
  • PHOTO Brookdale Monterey
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Monterey (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Somerby Sandy Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Somerby Sandy Springs averages 15.3 TCR (402% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Somerby Sandy Springs TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2017=16.8 · 2020=33.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=35.7 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Somerby Sandy Springs falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #173 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Somerby Sandy Springs (129 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Somerby Sandy Springs
Somerby Sandy Springs (129 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Somerby Sandy Springs has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 4.6 0.0 3 1 0
2022 35.7 33.8 16 22 0
2021 0.6 0.6 17 16 0
2020 33.9 33.9 9 26 0
2017 16.8 7.2 7 0 0
2016 14.3 7.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Sandy Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 38 employers in Sandy Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Monterey 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10545 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Brighton 15.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Flavor Farms 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE HARRISON CONTRACTING COMPANY 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkinsville 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solo Cup Company Augusta 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR EAST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercedes-Benz USA LLC Corporate Headquarters 1,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Springs Theatre 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crew One Productions - Atlanta 680 FTE
NAT-TCR Intex Technologies 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Colorado Springs 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Hospital Service Corporation 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student 15.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Long Prairie 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diplomat Healthcare 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delmar Gardens of Overland Park 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE DCA 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.