Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing · Oregon

Sonetics

Lake Oswego, OR · ~65 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sonetics runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Sonetics: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sonetics safety composite

Sonetics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sonetics: 2.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

Sonetics's TCR rose 1.7 from 2.0 in 2023 to 3.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334290 · Lake Oswego, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK P17
  • PHOTO Pyott Boone Electron…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pyott Boone Electronics Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Sonetics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sonetics averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sonetics TCR series: 2023=2 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Sonetics falls in its industry

103 Intercom systems and equipment establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Sonetics (65 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Sonetics
Sonetics (65 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Sonetics has fewer employees than the Intercom systems and equipment manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334290 · OR · Lake Oswego

103 Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 82 employers in Lake Oswego, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pyott Boone Electronics Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems I&S - Spring Lake 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potter Electric Signal Company 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOGUS MICROWAVE 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonanza 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holiday Tree Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Salem 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary's Woods at Marylhurst 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eclipse Support Center 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Springs at Lake Oswego 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1107 - NSM Mountain Park 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Dallas 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flower City Tissue Mills Company Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cennox Project and Security Solutions Inc (CA) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Prisma-Easley Hospital 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stealth Construction 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colby Metal, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardigan Ridge Senior Living 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Bluffs Senior Living 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.