Skilled nursing facilities · Arizona

South Mountain Post Acute

Phoenix, AZ · ~173 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Mountain Post Acute runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

South Mountain Post Acute: 2.6 TCR = 40% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Mountain Post Acute safety composite

South Mountain Post Acute scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

South Mountain Post Acute injury rate improved

South Mountain Post Acute's TCR fell 1.7 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.6 · 40% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #25/130
  • PHOTO Shore Gardens Rehabi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

South Mountain Post Acute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Mountain Post Acute averages 2.6 TCR (40% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Mountain Post Acute TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where South Mountain Post Acute falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 130 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Arizona.

South Mountain Post Acute (173 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate South Mountain Post Acute
South Mountain Post Acute (173 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

South Mountain Post Acute has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2023 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.3 6.3 7 0 0
2019 4.1 3.3 5 0 0
2018 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AZ · Phoenix

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Elm Rehabilitation and Living Centers 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green House Residence Care And Rehabilitation Center LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Hills Health Care Center 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE SALT RIVER PROJECT CORONADO GENERATING STATION 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Streams 4 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDB, Inc. Intel Ocotillo, Chandler 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Power Constructors 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Cowen Construction 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Hills Health Care Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR river city millwork inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoyt, Brumm & Link 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Qualico Steel Company, Inc. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralco Nutrition, Inc. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amvac Chemical Corporation 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Valley Children S Hospital Cen 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.