Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Virginia

Southampton Power Station

Franklin, VA · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southampton Power Station runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Southampton Power Station: 0.5 TCR = 41% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southampton Power Station safety composite

Southampton Power Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2022

Southampton Power Station injury rate improved

Southampton Power Station's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Franklin, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO Ontelaunee Power Ope…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ontelaunee Power Operating Company LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Southampton Power Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southampton Power Station averages 0.5 TCR (41% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southampton Power Station TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Southampton Power Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 Electric power generation, fos employers in Virginia.

Southampton Power Station (31 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southampton Power Station
Southampton Power Station (31 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Southampton Power Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · VA · Franklin

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 35 employers in Franklin, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ontelaunee Power Operating Company LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Indian River Power, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Independence Steam Electric Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jones Station 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WARREN COUNTY POWER STATION 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dabney 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Pittsylvania 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Hopewell 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Hampton Medical Center 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper Franklin Mill 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2705 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2705 273 FTE
NAT-TCR Gavilon Grain - Galesburg 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bucklin St 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1037 - Lafayette-LA 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Apple Cleaners 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6957-SCE 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Canton Haggerty 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contemporary Concepts, Inc. Architectural Mill 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eugene/Springfield Administration 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.