Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Nevada

Southeast Connector - Project

Reno, NV · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Connector - Project runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Southeast Connector - Project: 1.3 TCR = 47% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Connector - Project safety composite

Southeast Connector - Project scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2017

Southeast Connector - Project injury rate improved

Southeast Connector - Project's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Reno, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/29
  • PHOTO Fossett Paving Co., …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fossett Paving Co., LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Connector - Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Connector - Project averages 1.3 TCR (47% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Connector - Project TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Southeast Connector - Project falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 29 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Nevada.

Southeast Connector - Project (73 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Connector - Project
Southeast Connector - Project (73 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Southeast Connector - Project has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NV · Reno

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fossett Paving Co., LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR McDonald Excavating Inc 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR F & B Contractors, Ltd. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon Paving, Inc. 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kynd 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Mill Consulting Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE H.E. Hunewill Construction Co.,Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas, NV HVAC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR Vanderveer's Gas Service - Biscoe - Robbins, NC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CoorsTek - Worcester Ma. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Road 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Mining 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Choices Are For Everyone 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Meadows Nursing and Rehab LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allstate Power Vac Inc. - Brooklyn Service Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recovery Unplugged Austin LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.