Electric Power Distribution · Alabama

Southeast Division Headland Office

Headland, AL · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Division Headland Office runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Southeast Division Headland Office: 2.9 TCR = 244% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Division Headland Office safety composite

Southeast Division Headland Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southeast Division Headland Office held a steady TCR band

Southeast Division Headland Office's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.6 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Headland, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 244% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #49/138
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Energy -…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Division Headland Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Division Headland Office averages 2.9 TCR (244% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Division Headland Office TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Southeast Division Headland Office falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 138 Electric Power Distribution employers in Alabama.

Southeast Division Headland Office (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Division Headland Office
Southeast Division Headland Office (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Southeast Division Headland Office has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AL · Headland

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 10 employers in Headland, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - FB Culley 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lexington Meter Department 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUPERTINO SERVICE CENTER & DE 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillabee Plant 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillabee 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.K. Upchurch Construction Co., Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shades Mountain Water Treatment Plant Improvements 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headland GP Shelling Plant 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donald Smith Company, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Star Yeast Company 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pruitt Communications, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-TCR Gerald 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtiss Wright EPD 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SCVHHS, Behavorial Health Services (415) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SMCTD-South Base Bus Maintenance 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Duggans Trucking Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBUS 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 001 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sahling Kenworth of York 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.