Air system balancing and testing · Florida

Southeast Mechanical Contractors

Hollywood, FL · ~137 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Mechanical Contractors runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air system balancing and testing workplace, earning a grade D.

Southeast Mechanical Contractors: 4.6 TCR = 165% of Air system balancing and testing BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Mechanical Contractors safety composite

Southeast Mechanical Contractors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southeast Mechanical Contractors: 2.9 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.22× in 2024

Southeast Mechanical Contractors's TCR rose 2.3 from 2.9 in 2018 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Hollywood, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 165% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #240/425
  • PHOTO Air Filter Plus Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Air Filter Plus Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Mechanical Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Mechanical Contractors averages 4.6 TCR (165% of the Air system balancing and testing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Mechanical Contractors TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=7 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Southeast Mechanical Contractors falls in its industry

5,793 Air system balancing and testi establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #240 safest of 425 Air system balancing and testi employers in Florida.

Southeast Mechanical Contractors (137 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Mechanical Contractors
Southeast Mechanical Contractors (137 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Southeast Mechanical Contractors has more employees than the Air system balancing and testing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 1.0 10 0 0
2023 7.0 1.2 11 1 0
2022 3.5 0.7 5 0 0
2021 5.7 1.4 8 0 0
2020 3.4 1.7 2 2 0
2018 2.9 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · FL · Hollywood

5,793 Air system balancing and testing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 137 employers in Hollywood, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Air Filter Plus Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodson (Central Operations) Support Center 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Camden 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & G Mechanical Inc. 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PWC-West County Energy Center 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartshorn Tampa 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE McEnany Roofing, Inc T 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergelectric Corp. FL 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-47852 815 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROWARD 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR 47852 CUR DIPLOMAT HOLLYWOOD FL 732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Labor For Hire - Hollywood 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Tomah Environmental Contractors, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Nursery Company, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange County Crating 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aberdeen Energy, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bethel Home & Services, Inc. 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primm Valley Shared Services 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salco-Lemont 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allegheny Millwork PBT 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.