Conservation advocacy organizations · California

Southern California Mountains Foundation

San Bernardino, CA · ~113 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern California Mountains Foundation runs at 690% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conservation advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade F.

Southern California Mountains Foundation: 14.5 TCR = 690% of Conservation advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern California Mountains Foundation safety composite

Southern California Mountains Foundation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 14.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southern California Mountains Foundation: 11.8 → 18.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Southern California Mountains Foundation's TCR rose 6.7 from 11.8 in 2020 to 18.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813312 · San Bernardino, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 690% of ind

  • DART 10.9 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Conservation Legacy
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Conservation Legacy (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Southern California Mountains Foundation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern California Mountains Foundation averages 14.5 TCR (690% of the Conservation advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern California Mountains Foundation TCR series: 2020=11.8 · 2021=15.4 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Southern California Mountains Foundation falls in its industry

39 Conservation advocacy organiza establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 13.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Conservation advocacy organiza employers in California.

Southern California Mountains Foundation (113 employees, TCR 14.5) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 13.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern California Mountains Foundation
Southern California Mountains Foundation (113 employees, TCR 14.5) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 13.4

Southern California Mountains Foundation has more employees than the Conservation advocacy organizations median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 13.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 10.9 14 3 0
2023 14.8 7.4 11 3 0
2022 11.8 7.1 10 0 0
2021 15.4 7.0 10 1 0
2020 11.8 7.4 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813312 · CA · San Bernardino

39 Conservation advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Conservation Legacy 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento SPCA 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peconic Land Trust 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Friends Animal Sanctuary 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE OSR Enterprises, Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE 33150 Pond Rd, Delano CA 93215 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Harvest Berry Farms 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE MARTIN LOERA MEDINA 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR Lynx Contractors, Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Industry 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 20031 Midwest Distribution Center 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AaCron Inc 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dfa Fluid - Rensselaer Ny 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Chatsworth GA 1149 Duvall 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leviton Manufacturing (Lebanon Distribution Center) 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Sugar Valley GA Support Center 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.