Aerial or picker truck,construction,rental with operator · Florida

Southern Engineering & Construction

Sunrise, FL · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Engineering & Construction runs at 564% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aerial or picker truck,construction,rental with operator workplace, earning a grade F.

Southern Engineering & Construction: 15.8 TCR = 564% of Aerial or picker truck,construction,rental with operator BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Engineering & Construction safety composite

Southern Engineering & Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southern Engineering & Construction: 12.3 → 17.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2018

Southern Engineering & Construction's TCR rose 5.3 from 12.3 in 2016 to 17.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Sunrise, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 564% of ind

  • DART 13.3 DART
  • RANK #111/111
  • PHOTO C & M Excavation & U…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C & M Excavation & Utilities LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Southern Engineering & Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Engineering & Construction averages 15.8 TCR (564% of the Aerial or picker truck,construction,rental with operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Engineering & Construction TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=17.3 · 2018=17.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Southern Engineering & Construction falls in its industry

1,750 Aerial or picker truck,constru establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 111 Aerial or picker truck,constru employers in Florida.

Southern Engineering & Construction (20 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Engineering & Construction
Southern Engineering & Construction (20 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Southern Engineering & Construction has fewer employees than the Aerial or picker truck,construction,rent median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 17.7 13.3 4 0 0
2017 17.3 17.3 4 0 0
2016 12.3 8.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · FL · Sunrise

1,750 Aerial or picker truck,construction,rental with operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 116 employers in Sunrise, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C & M Excavation & Utilities LLC 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2329_4266 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobson Excavation LLC 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR M.J. Baxter Drilling Company 15.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ranch One Cooperative, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Mascotte 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Lee Florida 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suwannee River Plant 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthTrust Workforce Solutions 7,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steven Douglas Associates 767 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DMI4 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUNRFLCC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 572 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #775 (Libby, MT) 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 372 ABC Supply Co., inc 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gardenview Assisted Living and Memory Care 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 4233 W. Ferdinand St. 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WC Winston-Salem 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service 5210 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE TriGreen Equipment Mt. Juliet 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agricultural Construction 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.