Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Georgia

Southern Perfection Fabrication

Byron, GA · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Perfection Fabrication runs at 300% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Southern Perfection Fabrication: 9.9 TCR = 300% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Perfection Fabrication safety composite

Southern Perfection Fabrication scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2022

Southern Perfection Fabrication injury rate improved

Southern Perfection Fabrication's TCR fell 5.7 from 12.0 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=12.7 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=12.5 · 2022=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Byron, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 300% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #56/61
  • PHOTO Sound Manufacturing,…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sound Manufacturing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Southern Perfection Fabrication in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Perfection Fabrication averages 9.9 TCR (300% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Perfection Fabrication TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=12.7 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=12.5 · 2022=6.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Southern Perfection Fabrication falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 61 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Georgia.

Southern Perfection Fabrication (51 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Perfection Fabrication
Southern Perfection Fabrication (51 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Southern Perfection Fabrication has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.4 2.1 3 0 0
2020 12.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 5.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 12.7 5.1 5 0 0
2016 12.0 7.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · GA · Byron

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 22 employers in Byron, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sound Manufacturing, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G. W. Vines Company, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Institutional Equipment Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Machine 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Williams Produce, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE NOTCH ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPARATION 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Peachtree Service Center 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1202-Navicent Health Medical Center - Peach 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1291 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center, Peach County 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pyrotechnic Specialties Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-TCR 569100-Wittenberg Po 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 417547-Scr-Taylor Br 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 080136-Ansonia Po 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-01420 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marion Process Solutions 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG584 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG304 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6925-LIH 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.