Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Texas

Southern Region Customer Center

Houston, TX · ~142 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Region Customer Center runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Southern Region Customer Center: 0.9 TCR = 41% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Region Customer Center safety composite

Southern Region Customer Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2021

Southern Region Customer Center injury rate improved

Southern Region Customer Center's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.9 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #43/292
  • PHOTO White Equipment Leas…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Equipment Leasing Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Southern Region Customer Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Region Customer Center averages 0.9 TCR (41% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Region Customer Center TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Southern Region Customer Center falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 292 Construction machinery and equ employers in Texas.

Southern Region Customer Center (142 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Region Customer Center
Southern Region Customer Center (142 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Southern Region Customer Center has more employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · Houston

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Equipment Leasing Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Muncie 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Power Services Denver Kingston Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casper 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas Corporate Office 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookshire Office 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Houston 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE PM Construction & Rehab LLC dba IPR - South Central 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Impact Bartram, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health Plans, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoals Technologies, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US137: North Jersey 518 - SG 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Electric, Inc 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE The IFH Group, Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munch Supply O'Connor LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMI 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.