Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial · Georgia

Southern Rewinding - Columbus

Columbus, GA · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Rewinding - Columbus runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial workplace, earning a grade C.

Southern Rewinding - Columbus: 2.3 TCR = 107% of Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Rewinding - Columbus safety composite

Southern Rewinding - Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2021

Southern Rewinding - Columbus injury rate improved

Southern Rewinding - Columbus's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Columbus, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/93
  • PHOTO Alta Enterprises LLC…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alta Enterprises LLC- Oakwood Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Southern Rewinding - Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Rewinding - Columbus averages 2.3 TCR (107% of the Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Rewinding - Columbus TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Southern Rewinding - Columbus falls in its industry

2,560 Electric motor repair and main establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 93 Electric motor repair and main employers in Georgia.

Southern Rewinding - Columbus (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Rewinding - Columbus
Southern Rewinding - Columbus (40 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Southern Rewinding - Columbus has fewer employees than the Electric motor repair and maintenance se median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 3.8 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · GA · Columbus

2,560 Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- Oakwood Village 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dealership - Foothill Ranch 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR C659 Monroe ROC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedrock 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Grove Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Hoboken, GA 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Gin Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffee Co Gin County Inc 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Polar Service Centers - Port Allen 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR #9 Shadyside 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedrock 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 44361b - Gainsville Fl Ges Pec 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ruan Transport Corporation T-538 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE AR FRT - Springdale 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bedford, The 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palms, The 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.