Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Southminster Inc.

Charlotte, NC · ~393 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southminster Inc. runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

Southminster Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 118% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southminster Inc. safety composite

Southminster Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Southminster Inc. injury rate improved

Southminster Inc.'s TCR fell 2.4 from 5.5 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 118% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #33/105
  • PHOTO Cadence at Clemmons
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~393 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cadence at Clemmons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Southminster Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southminster Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (118% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southminster Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Southminster Inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Southminster Inc. (393 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southminster Inc.
Southminster Inc. (393 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Southminster Inc. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.9 11 0 0
2023 3.4 3.1 12 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 10 0 0
2021 5.1 5.1 14 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 11 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 14 0 0
2018 6.8 1.7 20 0 0
2016 5.5 2.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Charlotte

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Clemmons 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Port Square 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Village - Normal 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington Presbyterian Manor 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE American & Efird Dyeing & Finishing Plant 15 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moog Inc. 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1348 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT6 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 143016-Riverside | CA | SAN-543 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holt Plumbing 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IMPACTLIFE - Peoria 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Views of Marion 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE SSA Terminals, LLC (Matson) C-60 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE INVISTA, Camden 393 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - TUS5 393 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.