Home nursing services, private practice · Illinois

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Chicago, IL · ~185 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Home nursing services, private practice workplace, earning a grade C.

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 3.1 TCR = 83% of Home nursing services, private practice BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2023

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621399 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO 855 Pine Street
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 855 Pine Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 3.1 TCR (83% of the Home nursing services, private practice BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

111 Home nursing services, private establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Home nursing services, private employers in Illinois.

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (185 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (185 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Southpoint Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Home nursing services, private practice median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 4 0
2016 4.9 4.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621399 · IL · Chicago

111 Home nursing services, private practice employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 855 Pine Street 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellsville Manor Care Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landmark of Collins 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3223FALLIGANT AVE ASSOCIATES LP DBA THUNDERBOLT TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHABILITATION 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Fairview Heights 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teutopolis 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gonnella Baking Company 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mondelez Global, LLC Naperville Plant 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinder Morgan Portland Terminal 4 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethany Resort Furnishings 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Azteca Milling 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Warroad Care Center, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swank Enterprises 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta Mart, L.L.C. # 00 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE DDS Utilities, LLC 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Core-Mark Tampa 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.