Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Florida

Southport Truck Group-Tampa

Tampa, FL · ~131 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southport Truck Group-Tampa runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade D.

Southport Truck Group-Tampa: 5.4 TCR = 159% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southport Truck Group-Tampa safety composite

Southport Truck Group-Tampa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2020

Southport Truck Group-Tampa injury rate improved

Southport Truck Group-Tampa's TCR fell 1.7 from 6.7 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 159% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #214/254
  • PHOTO J&M Autos dba Taylor…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J&M Autos dba Taylor's AutoMax GMC Nissan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Southport Truck Group-Tampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southport Truck Group-Tampa averages 5.4 TCR (159% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southport Truck Group-Tampa TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=5 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5 · BLS 3.4

Where Southport Truck Group-Tampa falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #214 safest of 254 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Florida.

Southport Truck Group-Tampa (131 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southport Truck Group-Tampa
Southport Truck Group-Tampa (131 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Southport Truck Group-Tampa has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.0 3.6 7 0 0
2019 4.6 3.5 8 0 0
2018 5.0 3.7 8 0 0
2017 5.7 3.6 8 0 0
2016 6.7 4.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · FL · Tampa

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J&M Autos dba Taylor's AutoMax GMC Nissan 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLASSIC CHEVROLET SUGAR LAND LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Lathrop- E Louise Ave 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blaise Alexander Chevrolet Volvo of Greencastle 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE May Nursery, Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Broward Construction 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Countryside Glass and Mirror 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Heating and Air 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR REN160 Chino 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun City Texas Community Assn 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Girl Houston 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenwood Park Mall 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartland of Riverview 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turner at ExxonMobil Baytown TX 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Corn Milling 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 672 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.