Skilled nursing facilities · Maine

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center

Biddeford, ME · ~119 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center: 10.7 TCR = 164% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center safety composite

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2016→2024

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center injury rate improved

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center's TCR fell 10.0 from 13.2 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.2 · 2017=16.2 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=16.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=11.3 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Biddeford, ME ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.7 · 164% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #57/124
  • PHOTO Medilodge of Sterlin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medilodge of Sterling Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center averages 10.7 TCR (164% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center TCR series: 2016=13.2 · 2017=16.2 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=16.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=11.3 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 124 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Maine.

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center (119 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center
Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center (119 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Southridge Rehabilitation & Living Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.1 6 0 0
2022 11.3 8.1 7 0 0
2020 7.7 7.7 7 0 0
2019 16.1 15.0 15 0 0
2018 7.2 4.8 6 0 0
2017 16.2 12.1 16 0 0
2016 13.2 8.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · ME · Biddeford

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 50 employers in Biddeford, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Sterling Heights 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR West River Health Campus 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grace Home Nursing Home 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowbrook at Bloomer 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Microwave Techniques LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2496 LOWE S OF THOMASTON ME 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000004560 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000002541 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMHC MaineHealth 1,565 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMHC Biddeford 1,133 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2153 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #75 305 FTE
NAT-TCR West River Health Campus 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Medilodge of Sterling Heights 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cape Canaveral Air Force Station 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grace Home Nursing Home 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE LOU 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville East 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrison Woods Health Campus 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beechmont Toyota 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.