Distribution of natural gas · Georgia

SouthStar Energy Services

Atlanta, GA · ~117 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SouthStar Energy Services runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade C.

SouthStar Energy Services: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SouthStar Energy Services safety composite

SouthStar Energy Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SouthStar Energy Services held a steady TCR band

SouthStar Energy Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/61
  • PHOTO FIRST PLACE TOWER
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FIRST PLACE TOWER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

SouthStar Energy Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SouthStar Energy Services averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SouthStar Energy Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where SouthStar Energy Services falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 61 Distribution of natural gas employers in Georgia.

SouthStar Energy Services (117 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SouthStar Energy Services
SouthStar Energy Services (117 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

SouthStar Energy Services has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · GA · Atlanta

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FIRST PLACE TOWER 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office - PNG 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ONG WR OKC DIV GO 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sempra Energy Headquarters - 53 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Jefferson 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bellwood 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Mechanical Contractors & Engineers, LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCoy Grading, Inc. 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spartanburg SC 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shepherd of The Valley Lutheran Retirement Inc. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE MHP Manager LLC 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pontchartrain Mechanical, LLC 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.