Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local · Arkansas

Southwest Transportation (CV)

Siloam Springs, AR · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwest Transportation (CV) runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local workplace, earning a grade F.

Southwest Transportation (CV): 9.5 TCR = 212% of Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwest Transportation (CV) safety composite

Southwest Transportation (CV) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2023

Southwest Transportation (CV) injury rate improved

Southwest Transportation (CV)'s TCR fell 3.4 from 6.8 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=13.6 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Siloam Springs, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO TLSI - Transport - L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TLSI - Transport - Long Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Southwest Transportation (CV) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwest Transportation (CV) averages 9.5 TCR (212% of the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwest Transportation (CV) TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=13.6 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Southwest Transportation (CV) falls in its industry

1,130 Specialized Freight (except Us establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Specialized Freight (except Us employers in Arkansas.

Southwest Transportation (CV) (28 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwest Transportation (CV)
Southwest Transportation (CV) (28 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Southwest Transportation (CV) has fewer employees than the Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 0 1 0
2022 14.6 14.6 1 3 0
2021 18.2 18.2 2 3 0
2020 13.6 10.2 2 2 0
2019 6.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 6.8 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · AR · Siloam Springs

1,130 Specialized Freight (except Used Goods) Trucking, Local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 42 employers in Siloam Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TLSI - Transport - Long Beach 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villa Park Trucking 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renal Home Patient - P and F (Montgomery NY USA - P and F) 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR All-Points Petroleum,LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timber Logistics, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grannis/Broken Bow Growout 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Today's Power, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSC Arkansas 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gates Corporation 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSFP 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4 415 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4 398 FTE
NAT-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Bloomington Towanda 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1980 SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NJ 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Theisen's of Cedar Rapids NE 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SSA Pacific - Cruise (Breakbulk) 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ToyotaLift NE - VIC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barricades 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster Nursery 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverstone 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.