Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) · New Jersey

SPAR FDM Field Administration

Red Bank, NJ · ~87 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SPAR FDM Field Administration runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) workplace, earning a grade A.

SPAR FDM Field Administration: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SPAR FDM Field Administration safety composite

SPAR FDM Field Administration scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2021

SPAR FDM Field Administration injury rate improved

SPAR FDM Field Administration's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 452990 · Red Bank, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/62
  • PHOTO Big Lots Store #226 …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Big Lots Store #226 LOUISVILLE, KY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

SPAR FDM Field Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SPAR FDM Field Administration averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SPAR FDM Field Administration TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.4

Where SPAR FDM Field Administration falls in its industry

2,120 Catalog showrooms, general mer establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 62 Catalog showrooms, general mer employers in New Jersey.

SPAR FDM Field Administration (87 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SPAR FDM Field Administration
SPAR FDM Field Administration (87 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 23 employees and a TCR of 4.1

SPAR FDM Field Administration has more employees than the Catalog showrooms, general merchandise ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

452990 · NJ · Red Bank

2,120 Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 22 employers in Red Bank, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #226 LOUISVILLE, KY 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location 2 Santee 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR (E) Big Lot Store #5332 Sevierville, TN 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Lots Store #1991 ORANGEBURG, SC 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 590 - Philadelphia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victoria Fine Foods 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchtown RTS 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chroma Color Corporation - LAM 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPAR Field Services 7,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR FDM Associates Inc - SFS 4,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverview Medical Center 1,614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maser Consulting, Red Bank 561 FTE
NAT-TCR A&B Printing 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville Plant 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Honda of South Carolina Mfg. Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JEG & Sons, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gardner-Watson Decking, Inc. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-ILSF 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Westminster College (Pa) 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vonderlieth Living Center #549 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.