Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Texas

Sparkler Filters Inc

Conroe, TX · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sparkler Filters Inc runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Sparkler Filters Inc: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sparkler Filters Inc safety composite

Sparkler Filters Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2021→2024

Sparkler Filters Inc injury rate improved

Sparkler Filters Inc's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Conroe, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Komline-Henry
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Komline-Henry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sparkler Filters Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sparkler Filters Inc averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sparkler Filters Inc TCR series: 2021=7.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sparkler Filters Inc falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Texas.

Sparkler Filters Inc (36 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Sparkler Filters Inc
Sparkler Filters Inc (36 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sparkler Filters Inc has fewer employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · TX · Conroe

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 271 employers in Conroe, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Komline-Henry 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Iron and Metal Corp 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Winsupply 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DONALDSON COMPANY VALENCIA CA 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Houston Healthcare Conroe 1,069 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Houston Conroe 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medivators - TX 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Eye Associates - CNR 616 FTE
NAT-TCR Devon's Chocolates 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Asphalt Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Panoramic LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR August Bioservices, LLC. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1874 Swn5 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Louisiana, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Contracting Services Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque NW Warehouse 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.