Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing · Michigan

Sparks Belting

Grand Rapids, MI · ~99 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sparks Belting runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sparks Belting: 5.8 TCR = 175% of Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sparks Belting safety composite

Sparks Belting scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sparks Belting: 1.1 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2023

Sparks Belting's TCR rose 3.0 from 1.1 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 175% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Yokohama Industries …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yokohama Industries Americas Ohio (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Sparks Belting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sparks Belting averages 5.8 TCR (175% of the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sparks Belting TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=13.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Sparks Belting falls in its industry

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo employers in Michigan.

Sparks Belting (99 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sparks Belting
Sparks Belting (99 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Sparks Belting has fewer employees than the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevato median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2021 2.2 0.7 3 0 0
2018 13.2 13.2 10 0 0
2017 8.4 8.4 7 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · MI · Grand Rapids

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yokohama Industries Americas Ohio 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kadant Unaflex, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluid Routing Solutions - Ocala 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FFGR 33rd 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reichenbach Ceiling & Partition Co. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JD Candler Roofing Company 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weather Shield Roofing Systems, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Detroit 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Eclipse Advantage - ALDIMO - O'Fallon, MO 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Waikiki 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Youngstown Area Jewish Federation 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Inman Healthcare 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PEP : LSMD - Vienna 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Troy 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gloversville #195 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campus - Subacute 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.