Anchored earth retention contractors · New Mexico

Sparling Construction Company

Albuquerque, NM · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sparling Construction Company runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anchored earth retention contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sparling Construction Company: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Anchored earth retention contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sparling Construction Company safety composite

Sparling Construction Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sparling Construction Company held a steady TCR band

Sparling Construction Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Albuquerque, NM AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Olin Chlor Alkali Pr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olin Chlor Alkali Products St Gabriel LA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Sparling Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sparling Construction Company averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Anchored earth retention contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sparling Construction Company TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sparling Construction Company falls in its industry

932 Anchored earth retention contr establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Anchored earth retention contr employers in New Mexico.

Sparling Construction Company (38 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sparling Construction Company
Sparling Construction Company (38 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Sparling Construction Company has fewer employees than the Anchored earth retention contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 1 0 1
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · NM · Albuquerque

932 Anchored earth retention contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olin Chlor Alkali Products St Gabriel LA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jan's Construction Company, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIM at Cornerstone Chemicals Westwego LA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indorama Ventures Company Port Neches TX 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE D & L Meters & Instrument Service, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Service Center-193 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Sands Construction, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE WWRC Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Location 19036 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Telephonics 815 Farmingdale 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ring Container Headquarters 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fts- Fort Smith 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hood Container Jacksonville 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Renewable Energy 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Riley TFM 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.