Executive and legislative office combinations · South Carolina

Spartanburg County Government

Spartanburg, SC · ~1,561 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spartanburg County Government runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade A.

Spartanburg County Government: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spartanburg County Government safety composite

Spartanburg County Government scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Spartanburg County Government held a steady TCR band

Spartanburg County Government's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.6 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.6 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Spartanburg, SC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #1/28
  • PHOTO OFFICE OF FAMILY SAF…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~1,561 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OFFICE OF FAMILY SAFETY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Spartanburg County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spartanburg County Government averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spartanburg County Government TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Spartanburg County Government falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 28 Executive and legislative offi employers in South Carolina.

Spartanburg County Government (1,561 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spartanburg County Government
Spartanburg County Government (1,561 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Spartanburg County Government has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.5 10 0 0
2020 0.5 0.3 7 0 0
2019 0.9 0.3 14 0 0
2018 0.5 0.2 8 0 0
2017 0.6 0.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · SC · Spartanburg

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OFFICE OF FAMILY SAFETY 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR STATE TRIAL COURTS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ottawa County - James Street Campus 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Government Services 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aiken - PSR (BAMG) 1,556 FTE
STATE-SIZE HFT Dillon DC 1,566 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morningside of Lancaster 1,568 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kershaw County School District 1,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Grouop of the Carolinas 1,360 FTE
NAT-TCR J-Street 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooklyn Park Campus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bureau 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Waxman Consumer Products Group Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stafford (Txsta) 1,561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dollywood 1,561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital Joplin 1,561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enerfab Power and Industrial, LLC. 1,561 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.