Commercial building construction general contractors · Texas

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin

Austin, TX · ~114 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin: 1.3 TCR = 43% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin safety composite

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin held a steady TCR band

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #143/327
  • PHOTO Manusos General Cont…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manusos General Contracting, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin averages 1.3 TCR (43% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.9

Where SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 327 Commercial building constructi employers in Texas.

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin (114 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin
SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin (114 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

SpawGlass Contractors Inc. - Austin has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2021 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2017 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Austin

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manusos General Contracting, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR D. Wilson Construction 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cox Construction Co. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOSS Office/Shop 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lewis Resource Management - SA 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Transmission 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sitterle Homes Ltd 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texas Instruments SFAB1 Base Building #2128 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Kevin Downes Tree Service Co., Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dawson Terminal 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 12 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Point West RMC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Design & Build, LTD. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graphcom Gettysburg 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE WVWA Field Operations 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bolingbrook Office (Corporate HQ) 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.